Imagine this: a shopper opens Blinkit or Zepto, types in your brand name, and is seconds away from adding your SKU to their cart. But right before that Add to Cart click, they see a competitor’s ad, positioned exactly where your listing should be. They click. They buy. You lose.

On Q-commerce, brand keyword hijacking hurts far more than on traditional marketplaces because the shopper is already at the point of purchase. The proximity to checkout means the loss is instant. This isn’t just a category-level diversion; it often happens at the exact SKU level, stealing customers who were seconds away from buying your product.

And here’s the kicker: it’s not just lost sales, it’s margin erosion. For instance, a shopper typing “Amul Ghee” on Blinkit is first shown a sponsored ad by Milky Mist Cow Ghee, placed above Amul’s own SKUs. Another Milky Mist ad even shows up again within the top few results. This is a textbook case of brand keyword hijacking: Amul’s highest-intent customers, seconds away from adding its ghee to cart, are being intercepted and diverted to a competitor. On Q-commerce, where purchase journeys are compressed into under ten minutes, that single misplaced click means an instant lost sale and higher reacquisition costs later.

‍

Why Keyword Hijacking Hits Harder on Q-Commerce

Traditional e-commerce (Amazon, Flipkart) has multiple touchpoints: product discovery, reviews, price comparisons, and delivery options. A shopper might still bounce around before purchase. But on Blinkit, Zepto, or Instamart, the entire journey can be compressed into under two minutes.

• High intent, low patience: A majority of Q-commerce orders are completed in less than 10 minutes or so.
• Search-led buying: On quick-commerce platforms branded searches convert at rates higher than category searches.
• Prime placement = instant conversion: When your competitor captures your branded keyword, they’re not building awareness, they’re directly converting your customer at the finish line.

For challenger brands, this means every hijacked search isn’t just lost revenue, it’s stolen loyalty.

So how do you fight back against keyword hijacking without burning through budgets?

1. Own Your Shelf Space

Think of it as paying rent for the digital store window you already had. Allocate a fixed “brand defense” budget to ensure your SKUs always stay above the fold for your own keywords.

Why it works: Branded search terms usually have lower CPCs compared to generic keywords. Defending them ensures competitors can’t cheaply acquire your customers.

2. Rescue Retention 

A stolen customer isn’t gone forever, unless you let them be. Retargeting plays a critical role in pulling them back.

• Use app-native remarketing (push notifications, in-app offers) to remind customers of past purchases.
• Offer time-sensitive incentives (“Back in stock - order now”) to recapture urgency.
• Leverage loyalty programs to keep buyers sticky.

Retention rescue turns a hijacked order into a temporary setback, not a permanent loss.

3. Smarter Competitive Play

Sometimes the best defense is offense. Identify weak spots in competitor execution and use them to your advantage.

• Low reviews? Highlight your superior ratings in ad copy.
• Stockouts? Bid aggressively when competitors are unavailable.
• Smaller pack sizes? Push value messaging to win over price-sensitive shoppers.

This isn’t about reckless bidding wars, it’s about smarter strikes. By targeting vulnerable moments, you ensure every rupee spent carries disproportionate impact.

Turning Keyword Defense into Growth

For founders, keyword hijacking can feel like a tax you shouldn’t have to pay. But reframed strategically, it’s also an opportunity:

• Defensive spend protects your base. Think of it as insurance for the customers you’ve already worked hard to acquire.
• Retention plays multiply ROI. Even if a competitor steals one order, retargeting can win the next five.
• Precision attacks fuel growth. Every hijack you reverse isn’t just a reclaimed sale, it’s a competitor’s wasted spend.

The Challenger Brand Advantage

Legacy players will always have bigger budgets, but they’re slower to react. Challenger brands can weaponize agility, adjusting bids in real time, experimenting with sharper creatives, and building retargeting loops faster than giants bogged down in bureaucracy.

In the end, brand keyword hijacking is a battle of discipline, not rupees. The brands that consistently defend their own shelf, rescue retention quickly, and counter-attack when the timing is right will not just plug leaks, they’ll create a compounding advantage. Because in Q-commerce, the shopper isn’t browsing. They’re buying. And whether that buyer ends up clicking on your SKU or your competitor’s often comes down to a single hijacked search.

‍